Pedagogical Approaches
Cooperative Learning
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Cooperative learning structures classroom activities so that small groups of students work together toward a shared academic goal, with each member's success bound up in the group's success rather than in outcompeting classmates. David and Roger Johnson's research from the 1970s onward identified conditions such as positive interdependence under which group work reliably improves learning; they set out five essential elements for effective group learning in 1994. Done well it is associated with higher achievement, better reasoning and higher self-esteem than individualistic or competitive classroom structures, though it is vulnerable to social loafing, uneven workloads, and the difficulty of assessing individual contribution fairly.
Facts
Disputed
Most Effective ForClassrooms where the goal includes social and communication skills alongside content mastery; least reliable where group composition or task design lets one member do most of the work. 1 Johnson and Johnsons meta-analyses report overwhelmingly positive results for achievement and social skills, but cooperative learnings own literature documents recurring failure modes, social loafing and group hate, that depend heavily on task design and group composition rather than the method alone. Central QuestionCan structuring students work as a genuinely interdependent group, rather than as parallel individual effort, improve both what and how much they learn? 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Frequently Asked Questions
Is cooperative learning the same thing as collaborative learning?
Related but distinct: cooperative learning is teacher-structured with individual accountability; collaborative learning is looser and more student-directed.
The two terms are often used interchangeably, but researchers generally distinguish them. Cooperative learning, as David and Roger Johnson defined it, is teacher-structured: the task is broken into interdependent roles with individual accountability built in, and the teacher closely controls the process toward a specific, usually content-specific outcome. Collaborative learning is looser and more student-centered, with a group exploring an open question or building a shared product together rather than following a structured division of labor. Both rely on group work and peer interaction, and in casual use the labels are often swapped, but the atlas keeps cooperative learning's own entry focused on the structured, teacher-directed model the Johnsons researched.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.